At 8 PM Monday night, April 7th, 2014, a man walked into a police station in Los Angeles and opened fire on two officers. One officer was hit seven times, but both he and the female officer returned fire, hitting the suspect several times.
The officer is said to be in good condition, and the gunman was critical. No one else was injured.
Scary moments to be sure. But let's compare that with another incident that happened last week.
On Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014, Ivan Lopez walked into an administrative building in Fort Hood, and opened fire. Four people were killed and sixteen wounded.
That followed less than five years after Nidal Hasan (I'll refrain from using the title "Major", as he certainly dishonored his rank) killed thirteen, and injured more than thirty others.
What is the difference in the Fort Hood shootings, and the Los Angeles police station shooting?
Common sense.
As soon as the two officers in Los Angeles realized what was happening, they took action. They returned fire, incapacitated the gunman, and ended the incident.
As soon as the soldiers at Fort Hood realized what was happening, all they could do is run and hide, and wait for someone to come help them.
Men and women, who we have trained to be the best in the world were defenseless. Those we arm, and send into harm's way to defend third world countries when needed, were unable to defend their own lives on a military base here in our own country. Men and women who are more than capable of dealing with armed suspects intent on killing, were unable to do anything until Military Police arrived.
How stupid is this?
They are trained to defend our country, and we will not let them carry weapons on our bases here at home.
Similar circumstances:
1. Two officers versus one gunman. One officer injured; gunman incapacitated.
2. Dozens of United States soldiers versus one gunman. Thirteen killed, more than thirty wounded. Gunman shot and paralyzed, but still very much alive.
3. Again, dozens of United States soldiers versus one gunman. Four killed, and sixteen wounded. Gunman took his own life.
Let's paint a different picture.
Nidal Hasan walks in the building that morning in 2009, intending to kill as many soldiers as he can. Yet, as he pulls his weapon and readies himself to kill, others in the room see what's happening, and draw their weapons. Yes, he may have killed one or two, but then would have quickly found the justice he certainly deserved. No long court battles. No news stories about how many millions are being spent to provide food, shelter and transportation for Hasan.
What if Ivan Lopez had met the same resistance? He pulls his gun, and gets off a couple of rounds before others take him out?
And before you get on to me for not being compassionate, let me explain.
I know they are saying Lopez had some mental issues after serving overseas. I'm not saying he didn't deserve to get help. What I am saying is, the other innocent people deserved to go home to their families that night. If we had equipped the soldiers to do the job we expect them to do, and have trained them to do, the outcome would have been very different.
And it may be easy to look at the situation and feel a little safer. After all, it was on a military base, and the majority of us do not live there. But what if he had somehow taken a weapon from that base, and used it to attack the city of Killen, killing dozens? Would we then argue that we shouldn't have those weapons on our military bases?
It's been said a hundred times. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. And until we understand that the evil is not in the tool, but in the holder of that tool, we will continue to suffer.
Let's arm the men and women of our military. We let them carry weapons when they are protecting other countries. Let's tell them that their lives are worth as much as citizens in a country halfway across the world. Let them do what they were trained to do.
May God bless all who proudly serve. And may we proudly stand behind them.
Posts
